Assessment of damages – Unrestrained back seat passenger in a taxi - Excruciating headache and severe upper back pain – The effect of filing a Form 8A - The implications for cross examination in filing a Form 8A but opting not to call any witnesses - CPR 16.2(4) and CPR 16.2(5).
Allegations of fraud in obtaining certificate of title – No case submission at the end of the claimant’s case - Whether evidence cogent enough to establish fraud
Setting Aside Default Judgment – CPR 13.2 – Whether the claim form and particulars of claim were served – Whether the provisions of section 387 of the Companies Act is mandatory - CPR 13.3 – Whether the defence is one with a real prospect of success - Whether the affidavit in support of the application is an affidavit of merit- Whether service of the default judgment was irregular
Assessment of damages - Mallet finger deformity of the left index finger - 7% whole person impairment - PTSD diagnosis – Damages for domestic help - lack of evidence to support claim for handicap on the labour market
Setting Aside Default Judgment – CPR 13.3 – Whether the defence is one with a real prospect of success – Whether the defendant applied to set aside the defence as soon as reasonably practicable – Whether there is a good explanation for failing to file an acknowledgement of service within the time stipulated by the CPR – Whether the claim form was served
Setting Aside Default Judgment under CPR 13.3. - Whether the defence has a real prospect of success - If the defence has a real prospect of success, has the applicant applied to set aside the default judgment as soon as it was reasonably practicable - Does the applicant have a good reason for not filing an acknowledgement of service within the time stipulated by the CPR
Application to amend statement of case - CPR 19.4 - Adding a defendant after the limitation period - Whether case of misidentification or misnaming - CPR 20.4 – Application to strike out claimant’s statement of claim.
Judicial Review – Whether the Claimant has established illegality – Whether the signature of the Minister was forged – Whether there was a breach of statute – Whether the actions of the Minister were Wednesbury unreasonable or irrational – Whether there is a discretionary bar of delay.