Wood, Christopher v Maria Grey Grant, Dennis Lawson and Lawson Farms Limited
Injunction – Application for Injunction – Whether or not there is a serious issue to be tried – Adverse Possession – Limitation of Actions Act – Whether or not the Claimant has shown a case with a real prospect of success that his title was not defeated – Whether or not a purchaser in possession can be an adverse possessor.
Wedderburn, Ynoquie v Lawrence, Kerry Ann, Kemar Jarrett, Trevor Taylor, Paula Taylor and Norris Cassells
Civil Practice and Procedure – Ancillary Claims – Claim for Contribution/Indemnity – Time for Bringing Such an Ancillary Claim – Whether the Ancillary Claim is Statute Barred. Civil Practice and Procedure – Ancillary Claim – Claim Under the Law Reform (TortFeasors) Act – Whether the Cause of Action has arisen under the Law Reform (Tort- Feasors) Act – Whether Ancillary Claim for Indemnity under the Law Reform (TortFeasors) Act is Premature
Johnson, Karen v Robinson-Lewise, Michelle
Tort – Negligence – Motor Vehicle Collision – Whether Driver of Motor Vehicle Liable for Collision.
Tort – Negligence – Contributory Negligence – Motor Vehicle Collision – Whether or not Pedestrian Caused or Contributed to the Collision by Stepping into Path of Motor Vehicle.
Road Traffic Act (1938) – ss 51 and 95.
Road Traffic Act – Road Code 1987 – Part 1 Rules 1, 2, and 4 – Duty of Pedestrians When Using the Road.
Joiles, Barbara and Vallin Joiles v The Attorney General of Jamaica
Emergency Powers Act and Emergency Powers Regulations May and June 2010 – Civil Practice and Procedure – Nullity – Whether Suit as originally filed is a nullity for failure to allege that the Security forces did not act in good faith.
Emergency Powers Act and Emergency Powers Regulations May and June 2010 – Whether or not the Supreme Court has jurisdiction in Claims in Tort where the injuries are covered by the compensation scheme in the Emergency Powers Regulations.
Bisasor, Ryan v Attorney General of Jamaica
Tort – Malicious Prosecution – Whether or not Officer had Reasonable and/or Probable Cause to Charge the Claimant – Whether or not Officer Took the Time to get the True Facts Before Charging the Claimant.
Tort – False Imprisonment – Whether or not the Police Were Guilty of Unreasonable Delay in Considering Bail for the Claimant after Arrest.
Civil Practice and Procedure – Pleadings – Rule 8.9 of the CPR – Failure to Set out Factual Allegations and the Consequences.
Barrett, Delroy v Desnoes & Geddes Ltd.
Negligence – Employers Liability – Whether Claimant has established breach of duty of employer to provide safe system of work, sufficient staff and equipment – duty of claimant to provide sufficient evidence of breaches
Johnson, Audrey v Massey, Owen and Jermaine Butler
Tort – Negligence – Personal Injury – Motor Vehicle Collision
Tort – Negligence – Breach of Duty of Care – Whether Claimant has proven that the 2nd Defendant Driver Caused Any Part of the Truck to Hit the Claimant.
Civil Practice and Procedure – Pleadings – Particulars of Claim – Rule 8.9A – Whether or not the Claimant’s Amended Particulars of Claim are Supported by the Evidence at Trial.
Davis, Jacinth v Reid, Delroy and Topenga Properties (Jamaica) Limited
Tort – Negligence – Duty of Care – Breach of Duty – Nature of Duty of Care Owed – Whether Duty of Care Owed was Breached by the Defendant.
Idid Investment Company Ltd. v McGaw, Errol and Nancy McGaw
Civil Practice and Procedure – Application to Strike Out Counterclaim – Whether the Counterclaim filed against the Claimant should be struck out as disclosing no reasonable grounds for being brought - Application for Appointment of Expert Witness – Whether Defendants’ proposed expert witness is able to give independent and unbiased assistance to the Court to resolve the issues in dispute - Civil Procedure Rules – Rule 32.4
Green, John v Desnoes and Geddes Ltd, trading as Red Stripe, Constable O'Shane Ellis and the Attorney General
Tort – Malicious Prosecution – Whether or not the 2nd Defendant had reasonable and probable to prosecute the Claimant for the offences charged.
False Imprisonment – Whether or not the 2nd Defendant lawfully arrested and detained the Claimant – Whether or not the length of time for which the Claimant was held before being considered for bail or before facing the Court was unreasonable.
Pagination
- Page 1
- Next page