Skip to main content

Vision 

A world-class judiciary utilizing innovation and technology for efficient service delivery.

Mission

To provide sound, timely judgements and efficient court services in an environment where all stakeholders are valued.

Wood, Christopher v Maria Grey Grant, Dennis Lawson and Lawson Farms Limited

Injunction – Application for Injunction – Whether or not there is a serious issue to be tried – Adverse Possession – Limitation of Actions Act – Whether or not the Claimant has shown a case with a real prospect of success that his title was not defeated – Whether or not a purchaser in possession can be an adverse possessor.

Wedderburn, Ynoquie v Lawrence, Kerry Ann, Kemar Jarrett, Trevor Taylor, Paula Taylor and Norris Cassells

Civil Practice and Procedure – Ancillary Claims – Claim for Contribution/Indemnity – Time for Bringing Such an Ancillary Claim – Whether the Ancillary Claim is Statute Barred. Civil Practice and Procedure – Ancillary Claim – Claim Under the Law Reform (TortFeasors) Act – Whether the Cause of Action has arisen under the Law Reform (Tort- Feasors) Act – Whether Ancillary Claim for Indemnity under the Law Reform (TortFeasors) Act is Premature

Johnson, Karen v Robinson-Lewise, Michelle

Tort – Negligence – Motor Vehicle Collision – Whether Driver of Motor Vehicle Liable for Collision.
Tort – Negligence – Contributory Negligence – Motor Vehicle Collision – Whether or not Pedestrian Caused or Contributed to the Collision by Stepping into Path of Motor Vehicle.
Road Traffic Act (1938) – ss 51 and 95.
Road Traffic Act – Road Code 1987 – Part 1 Rules 1, 2, and 4 – Duty of Pedestrians When Using the Road.

Joiles, Barbara and Vallin Joiles v The Attorney General of Jamaica

Emergency Powers Act and Emergency Powers Regulations May and June 2010 – Civil Practice and Procedure – Nullity – Whether Suit as originally filed is a nullity for failure to allege that the Security forces did not act in good faith.
Emergency Powers Act and Emergency Powers Regulations May and June 2010 – Whether or not the Supreme Court has jurisdiction in Claims in Tort where the injuries are covered by the compensation scheme in the Emergency Powers Regulations.

Bisasor, Ryan v Attorney General of Jamaica

Tort – Malicious Prosecution – Whether or not Officer had Reasonable and/or Probable Cause to Charge the Claimant – Whether or not Officer Took the Time to get the True Facts Before Charging the Claimant.
Tort – False Imprisonment – Whether or not the Police Were Guilty of Unreasonable Delay in Considering Bail for the Claimant after Arrest.
Civil Practice and Procedure – Pleadings – Rule 8.9 of the CPR – Failure to Set out Factual Allegations and the Consequences.

Johnson, Audrey v Massey, Owen and Jermaine Butler

Tort – Negligence – Personal Injury – Motor Vehicle Collision
Tort – Negligence – Breach of Duty of Care – Whether Claimant has proven that the 2nd Defendant Driver Caused Any Part of the Truck to Hit the Claimant.
Civil Practice and Procedure – Pleadings – Particulars of Claim – Rule 8.9A – Whether or not the Claimant’s Amended Particulars of Claim are Supported by the Evidence at Trial.

Idid Investment Company Ltd. v McGaw, Errol and Nancy McGaw

Civil Practice and Procedure – Application to Strike Out Counterclaim – Whether the Counterclaim filed against the Claimant should be struck out as disclosing no reasonable grounds for being brought -  Application for Appointment of Expert Witness – Whether Defendants’ proposed expert witness is able to give independent and unbiased assistance to the Court to resolve the issues in dispute - Civil Procedure Rules – Rule 32.4

Green, John v Desnoes and Geddes Ltd, trading as Red Stripe, Constable O'Shane Ellis and the Attorney General

Tort – Malicious Prosecution – Whether or not the 2nd Defendant had reasonable and probable to prosecute the Claimant for the offences charged.


False Imprisonment – Whether or not the 2nd Defendant lawfully arrested and detained the Claimant – Whether or not the length of time for which the Claimant was held before being considered for bail or before facing the Court was unreasonable.

Subscribe to The Hon. Mr. Justice Dale Staple