Civil Procedure – Application for relief from sanctions – Multiple applications made by the claimant for relief from sanctions for the failure to file and exchange his witness statement within the time stipulated by order of the court – Application for relief from sanctions refused by the court – Res judicata – Whether the doctrine of res judicata applies to the subsequent application for relief from sanctions – Whether the doctrine of res judicata applies to discretionary decisions which are made at an interlocutory stage and before any findings of fact are made – Issue estoppel – Whether

Injunction – Application for interim injunction – Whether the threshold test for the grant of an injunction has been met – Whether the applicant has demonstrated on a preponderance of the evidence that there is a serious issue to be tried – Fraud – Whether there is sufficient cogent evidence before the court to establish fraud – Presumption of advancement – Whether the presumption of advancement has been rebutted on the evidence – Balance of convenience – Whether the balance of convenience lies in favour of granting the injunctive relief sought – Damages.

Judicial Review – Committal proceedings – Committal proceedings conducted by a single judge of the parish court sitting as an examining justice in a court of petty sessions – Accused person committed to stand trial in the circuit court for the offence of murder – Whether the decision of the examining justice is amenable to judicial review – Whether the statutory requirements for a committal on paper were complied with – Whether the impugned witness statement met the statutory requirements for admissibility – Whether the impugned witness statement purports to be signed by the maker and the r

Property Law - Land – Registered land – Application to bring land under the Registration of Titles Act – Allegation of fraud – Meaning of fraud under the Registration of Titles Act – Whether title obtained by fraud – Whether the claim for fraud is statute barred.
Limitation of Act sections 3, 4, 8, 27 and 30

Civil Procedure – Application to strike out claimant’s statement of case – Claim for wrongful dismissal – Whether the claimant’s statement of case discloses any reasonable grounds for bringing the claim – The distinction between a claim for wrongful dismissal and one for unjustifiable dismissal – Whether the claimant’s statement of case ought properly to be struck out – Sections 11 and 11B, The Labour Relations and Industrial Disputes Act – Rules 9.6 and 26, Civil Procedure Rules, 2002, as amended

Negligence – Motor vehicle collision – The duty of care – The duty of care in terms of proper care – Reciprocated duty – Road code – Breach – Effect – Breach creating no presumption of negligence – Contributory neglince - Credibility of witnesses.

Damages – Personal injury – Quantum of damages Road Traffic Act, sections 51(2), 53(1)(a) and (b) and 95(3), Island Traffic Authority Road Code, Part 2 – 1, 35, 39(b),(c),(d) and (e) and 40

Civil procedure – Striking out – Application to strike out claimant’s statement of case – Whether the claimant’s statement of case ought properly to be struck out – The approach of the court in dealing with an application to strike out – Whether the claimant has sufficiently particularized the claim – Whether the claimant’s statement of case as framed constitutes an abuse of the process of the court – Whether the claimant’s statement of case is prolix, frivolous and vexatious and without merit – Whether the claimant’s statement of case discloses any reasonable grounds for bringing the

Limitation of Actions – Land – Registered land – Trespass – Right to possession of land – Injury to possessory rights – What is deemed to be possession of land – Actual possession – Intention to possess land and the exercise of control over it to the exclusion of other persons – Nature and character of land – Unlawful and unjustifiable presence on land in the possession of another – Whether the 
claimant has proven that the defendant’s actions amount to the tort of trespass – Burden of proof – Standard of proof – Balance of Probabilities
Defence – Defence to trespass

Civil procedure – Summary judgment – Interlocutory application for summary judgment – Whether summary judgment ought properly to be granted in favour of the claimant on the claim – Whether summary judgment ought properly to be granted in favour of the ancillary claimant on the ancillary claim – The approach of the court in dealing with an application for summary judgment – Whether the defence to the claim has a reasonable prospect of success – Whether the defence to the ancillary claim has a reasonable prospect of success - Burden – Burden of proof – Standard –

Judicial Review – Claim for judicial review – Illegality – Error of law – Whether the operations stewards were duly authorized to investigate the claimant for failing to take all reasonable and permissible measures throughout a race to ensure that a horse that she was riding was given the best possible placing in the race – Whether the operations stewards were duly appointed authorized persons by the commission – Whether the operations stewards were duly issued with certificates of appointment as required by statute.