The Hon. Miss Justice Anne-Marie A. Nembhard

Civil Procedure – Application to strike out claimant’s statement of case – Claim for wrongful dismissal – Whether the claimant’s statement of case discloses any reasonable grounds for bringing the claim – The distinction between a claim for wrongful dismissal and one for unjustifiable dismissal – Whether the claimant’s statement of case ought properly to be struck out – Sections 11 and 11B, The Labour Relations and Industrial Disputes Act – Rules 9.6 and 26, Civil Procedure Rules, 2002, as amended

Negligence – Motor vehicle collision – The duty of care – The duty of care in terms of proper care – Reciprocated duty – Road code – Breach – Effect – Breach creating no presumption of negligence – Contributory neglince - Credibility of witnesses.

Damages – Personal injury – Quantum of damages Road Traffic Act, sections 51(2), 53(1)(a) and (b) and 95(3), Island Traffic Authority Road Code, Part 2 – 1, 35, 39(b),(c),(d) and (e) and 40

Civil procedure – Striking out – Application to strike out claimant’s statement of case – Whether the claimant’s statement of case ought properly to be struck out – The approach of the court in dealing with an application to strike out – Whether the claimant has sufficiently particularized the claim – Whether the claimant’s statement of case as framed constitutes an abuse of the process of the court – Whether the claimant’s statement of case is prolix, frivolous and vexatious and without merit – Whether the claimant’s statement of case discloses any reasonable grounds for bringing the claim

Limitation of Actions – Land – Registered land – Trespass – Right to possession of land – Injury to possessory rights – What is deemed to be possession of land – Actual possession – Intention to possess land and the exercise of control over it to the exclusion of other persons – Nature and character of land – Unlawful and unjustifiable presence on land in the possession of another – Whether the 
claimant has proven that the defendant’s actions amount to the tort of trespass – Burden of proof – Standard of proof – Balance of Probabilities
Defence – Defence to trespass

Civil procedure – Summary judgment – Interlocutory application for summary judgment – Whether summary judgment ought properly to be granted in favour of the claimant on the claim – Whether summary judgment ought properly to be granted in favour of the ancillary claimant on the ancillary claim – The approach of the court in dealing with an application for summary judgment – Whether the defence to the claim has a reasonable prospect of success – Whether the defence to the ancillary claim has a reasonable prospect of success - Burden – Burden of proof – Standard – Standard o

Judicial Review – Claim for judicial review – Illegality – Error of law – Whether the operations stewards were duly authorized to investigate the claimant for failing to take all reasonable and permissible measures throughout a race to ensure that a horse that she was riding was given the best possible placing in the race – Whether the operations stewards were duly appointed authorized persons by the commission – Whether the operations stewards were duly issued with certificates of appointment as required by statute.

Negligence – Motor vehicle collision – Vehicle parked on the roadway approaching a bend or curve in the roadway – Vehicle attempting to move around parked vehicle – The duty of care – The duty of care in terms of proper care – Reciprocated duty – Road Code – Breach – Effect – Breach creating no presumption of negligence – Road Traffic Act, sections 51(2), 53(1), 95(3), Island Traffic Authority Road Code, Part 2 – 35, 39(b), (c), (d) and (e) and 40

Tort – Wrongful interference with goods – Detinue – Conversion – Whether there was a wrongful taking, detaining and disposal of the claimant’s property

Limitation of Actions – Adverse possession – Land – Registered land – Tenancy-in-common – Co-owners hold interest in land as tenants-in-common – Extinction of title of registered co-owner – Whether the now deceased co-owner was dispossessed of his interest in the land prior to his death – Whether the estate of the now deceased co-owner was dispossessed of his interest in the land subsequent to his death – Whether the interest of the now deceased co-owner passed to his estate upon his death – Whether the claimant has proven that she has been in open and undisturbed possession of the land for

Defamation – Press release containing defamatory imputations against the claimant – Meaning of words published – Implications – Innuendo .
Burden – Burden of proof – Standard – Standard of proof – Whether the intention of the defendants is relevant.

Defence – Defence of fair comment – Defence of qualified privilege.
Damages – Principle of compensation to an individual claimant – The Defamation Act, 2013, sections 2, 3, 20(2), 20(3), 21(1), 30(1) and 30(2).