Skip to main content

Vision 

A world-class judiciary utilizing innovation and technology for efficient service delivery.

Mission

To provide sound, timely judgements and efficient court services in an environment where all stakeholders are valued.

Campbell, Carlton Edward v Willacy, Jacqueline

Land – Fraud – Forgery – Whether the signature of the deceased was forged – Burden of proof – Standard of proof – Expert evidence – The approach of the court when considered conflicting expert evidence – The Forgery Act, section 3 – The Registration of Titles Act – Sections 68, 70, 71 and 161 – The Civil Procedure Rules, 2002, as amended, rule 8.1(3), 8.1(4), 8.8(3), 8.8(4), 8.9, 32.13

Reid, Ruel, Fritz Pinnock, Sharon Reid and Sharelle Reid v Hogarth, Jewel (The Clerk of the Courts), Her Honour Ms. Sanchia Burrell and Financial Investigations Division

Judicial Review - Renewed application for leave to apply for judicial review – Parish Court Judge – Ruling that Order for Indictment properly made – Whether appeal an alternate remedy – Whether ruling intra vires – Whether application has real prospect of success- Award of costs. 

Cameron, Wayne (Chairman of Jamaica Police Officers' Association) v Commissioner of Police

Judicial review – Application for leave to apply for judicial review – Threshold test – Whether the applicant has an arguable ground with a realistic prospect of success – Whether the threshold for leave to apply for judicial review is a low one Incorporated and unincorporated associations – Whether the police officers’ association is an incorporated or an unincorporated association – Whether the police officers’ association is an entity which is known to law Illegality – Whether the decision of the commissioner of police to direct that the position of the chairman of the police officers’ a

RN v SKIL and SM

Civil Procedure – Application for relief from sanctions – Multiple applications made by the claimant for relief from sanctions for the failure to file and exchange his witness statement within the time stipulated by order of the court – Application for relief from sanctions refused by the court – Res judicata – Whether the doctrine of res judicata applies to the subsequent application for relief from sanctions – Whether the doctrine of res judicata applies to discretionary decisions which are made at an interlocutory stage and before any findings of fact are made – Issue estoppel – Whether

Donaldson, Matthew v Brownie, Chescot, Henry McCUrdy and Garth Wilkinson et al

Injunction – Application for interim injunction – Whether the threshold test for the grant of an injunction has been met – Whether the applicant has demonstrated on a preponderance of the evidence that there is a serious issue to be tried – Fraud – Whether there is sufficient cogent evidence before the court to establish fraud – Presumption of advancement – Whether the presumption of advancement has been rebutted on the evidence – Balance of convenience – Whether the balance of convenience lies in favour of granting the injunctive relief sought – Damages.

Robinson, Kenya v Ashley, Her Honour Ms. Ashley

Judicial Review – Committal proceedings – Committal proceedings conducted by a single judge of the parish court sitting as an examining justice in a court of petty sessions – Accused person committed to stand trial in the circuit court for the offence of murder – Whether the decision of the examining justice is amenable to judicial review – Whether the statutory requirements for a committal on paper were complied with – Whether the impugned witness statement met the statutory requirements for admissibility – Whether the impugned witness statement purports to be signed by the maker and the r

Zelaya-Miller, Sandra v Getfield, Festus Consolidated with Zelaya-Miller, Sandra v Getfield, Festus

Property Law - Land – Registered land – Application to bring land under the Registration of Titles Act – Allegation of fraud – Meaning of fraud under the Registration of Titles Act – Whether title obtained by fraud – Whether the claim for fraud is statute barred.
Limitation of Act sections 3, 4, 8, 27 and 30

Gayle, Hupert v The Transport Authority

Civil Procedure – Application to strike out claimant’s statement of case – Claim for wrongful dismissal – Whether the claimant’s statement of case discloses any reasonable grounds for bringing the claim – The distinction between a claim for wrongful dismissal and one for unjustifiable dismissal – Whether the claimant’s statement of case ought properly to be struck out – Sections 11 and 11B, The Labour Relations and Industrial Disputes Act – Rules 9.6 and 26, Civil Procedure Rules, 2002, as amended

Subscribe to The Hon. Miss Justice Anne-Marie A. Nembhard