The Hon. Miss Justice Hazel Harris

Gomes, Jennifer Carolyn et al v The Attorney General

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN MISCELLANEOUS
SUIT NO. M. 063/2000
BETWEEN JENNIFER CAROLYN GOMES 1'' APPLICANT
A N D MADGE HYLTON 2nd APPLICANT
A N D SUSAN GOFFE 3rd APPLICANT
A N D THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RESPONDENT
LJ
Hugh Small Q.C., Clyde Williams for 1" and 2" Applicants and Dennis Goffe,
Q.C, for 3rd Applicant instructed by Mrs.Sharon Usim of Chancellor & Co.
Evan Oniss & Miss Annaliesa Lindsay for Respondent
Heard: June 29 & July 3,2000
C; Harris, J.

Moore,Avinel v Bertram Henry

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN COMMON LAW
SUIT NO. C. L. M3 73 OF 1991
BETWEEN A VINEL MOORE
A N D BERTRAM HENRY
PLAINTIFF
DEFENDANT
Maurice Frankson instructed by
Gaynair and Fraser for plaint#
Miss Simone Mayhew instructed by
Patrick Bailey and Company for the defendant.
Heard: Januar~1 5,16,19 & April 19,2001
HARRIS, J.
On January 19, 200 1 the plaintiffs claim was dismissed and judgment
was awarded to the Defendant. I made a promise at that time to put my

Infochannel Ltd v Office of Utilities Regulation and Cable and Wireless Jamaica Limited

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN MISCELLANEOUS
SUIT M 40 OF 2001
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPL~CAT ION
BY INFOCHANNEL FOR AN O ~ D E RO F
PROHIBITION.
BETWEEN INFOCHANNEL LIMITED APPLICANT
AND OFFICE OF UTILITIES REGULATIONS ~ESPONDENT
AND CABLE dl WIRELESS JAMKA LTD INTERVENER
I
Dr. Lloyd Barnett and Harold Brady instructed by Brady aid Company for
Applicant.
I L
Patrick Brooks and Maurice Manning instructed by Ndpes Scholefield
Deleon and Company for the Respondent.

Ellis ,Inasu Everald v Attorney General and Ransford A. Fraser (Constable)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN COMMON LAW
SUIT C.L. E/050/1996 
BETWEEN INASU E VERALD ELLIS PLAINTIFF I
A N D ATTORNEY GENERAL
A N D RANSFORD A. FRASER
(CONSTABLE) 2ND DEFENDANT
Leon Green and Miss K. Anderson of Leon Green
And Company for plaintif$
\
Curtis Cockrane and Mrs. Joy Crawford instructed by the
Director of State Proceedings for defendants.
Heard: August 16,2000,
Januarv 8,10,2001& March 21,2001.
This is a an assessment of damages arising from a claim by the I

Champagnie, Donovan v Attorney General for Jamaica & Lyndon Wright

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN COMMON LAW
SUIT C.L. 1997/C442
BETWEEN DON0 VAN CHAMPA GNIE PLAINTIFF
A N D ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR
JAMAICA 1'' DEFENDANT
A N D L YNDON WRIGHT 2"d DEFENDANT
Danesh Maragh instructed by Fay Chang Rhule & Co.
for plaintifJ:
John Francis instructed by Director of State Proceedings
for Defendant.
Heard: Januam 16,18 & Februarv 16,2001
Harris, J.
The plaintiffs' claiin against the defendants is to recover damages for ~

Brown ,Dennis v Jamaica Pre-Mix Ltd

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN COMMON LA W
SUIT C.L. 1991/B118
BE TWEEN DENNIS BROWN PLAINTIFF
A N D JAMAICA PRE-MIX L TD. DEFENDANT
Mrs. N. Khan instructed by Messrs. Khan and Khan for plaintiff
Mr. David Batts instructed by Messrs. Livingston, Alexander & Levy
for defendant.
Heard: November 1,2000,
Januarv 15,16,17, and March 24,2001.
HARRIS, J.
The plaintiffs claim against the defendant is to recover damages for
negligence and or for breach of Statutory duty.

Pages

Covid-19

Matrimonial Proceedings

Customer Service

customer complaints image

Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan for the Jamaican Judiciary 2019-2023