The Hon. Mr. Justice Kirk Anderson

Application for the status quo to remain – Application for the parties to agree on an independent person - Res Judicata - Application for injunction – Administrator’s rights and duties - Intermeddling in estate - Balance of Justice - Whether the grant of the interim injunction will have the effect of giving the claimant judgment without a trial

Assessment of damages – General damages – Special damages – Mitigation of losses – Claim for loss of earning capacity – Claim for future medical expenses

Application for relief from sanction after statement of case struck out –- Whether the application was made promptly – Whether the claimant’s failure to comply was unintentional – Whether the claimant’s alleged impecuniosity is a good explanation for his non-compliance – Whether the claimant has generally complied with all other relevant rules, practice directions, orders and directions – Rule 26.8 of the Civil Procedure Rule

Interpretation of contracts – Applicability of arbitration clause – Meaning of ‘difference’ in the context of an arbitration clause – Summary Judgment – Whether the matter is one for summary judgment.

Statutory Interpretation - Meaning of ‘shall’ in paragraphs 13 and 14 of the First Schedule of the Registration (Strata Titles) Act - Whether the Commission for Strata Corporations can hear disputes between proprietors under section 3B (1) (c) of the Registration (Strata Titles) Act - Judicial Review – Certiorari - Irrationality/ Unreasonableness - Whether the tribunals acted unreasonably - Natural Justice - Duty to act fairly - Legitimate Expectation - Whether there was an expectation that is legitimate – Burden of Proof – Standard of Proof

Redundancy dispute - Judicial review - Whether the Industrial Disputes Tribunal has jurisdiction over redundancy matters - Statutory interpretation - Generalia specialibus non deerogant - Labour Relatations and Industrial Disputes Act - Employment (Termination and Redundancy Payments) Act. 

Redundancy matter - Judicial review - Statutory interpretation - Generallia specialibus non deorgant - Labour Relations and Industrial Disputes Act - Employment (Termination and Redundancy) Payments Act - Whether industrial disputes tribunal has jurisdiction over redundancy matters.

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION – WHETHER CLAIMANT WAS MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTED – WHO PROSECUTED THE CLAIMANT – WHETHER 2ND AND 3RD DEFENDANTS CAN PROPERLY BE HELD INDIVIDUALLY LIABLE – WHETHER THE 2ND OR THE 3RD DEFENDANT PROSECUTED THE CLAIMANT WITHOUT ANY REASONABLE AND/OR PROBABLE CAUSE – PROSECUTOR WHO IS A POLICE OFFICER HAVING ACTED ON INSTRUCTION OF CLERK OF COURT – ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

REDUNDANCY MATTER – JUDICIAL REVIEW – STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – GENERALIA SPECIALIBUS NON DEORGANT – LABOUR RELATIONS AND INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT – EMPLOYMENT (TERMINATION AND REDUNDANCY PAYMENTS) ACT – WHETHER INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES TRIBUNAL HAS JURISDICTION OVER REDUNDANCY MATTERS