LIVE STREAM: Call to the Bar Ceremony


Vision 

A world-class judiciary utilizing innovation and technology for efficient service delivery.

Mission

To provide sound, timely judgements and efficient court services in an environment where all stakeholders are valued.

The Hon. Mr. Justice Roy Anderson

Reid, Curtis v Cable and Wireless Jamaica Limited, Jentech Limited and Reid, Wayne

Whether breach of employment contract of the claimant - Whether implied term of mutual trust and confidence is available to assist the claimant - Whether damages recoverable for breach of implied term in addition to damages for wrongful dismissal - Whether the rule in Addis v Gramaphone Company  is still good law - Tort of conspiracy - Whether proven - Defence to charge of conspiracy to injure.

Garrick, Vincent v The Transport Authority

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OP JAMAICA
IN COMMON LAW
SUIT NO: G - 032 OF 2001
BETWEEN VINCENT GARRlCK
AND THE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY DEFENDANT
Matter heard on April 30, and May 10,2001; Judgment delivered June 20,2001
Don. 0. Foote, Esq., Attorney-at-Law, for the Plaintiff
Curtis, Cochrane, Esa, Attorney-at-Law for the Defendant
JUDGMENT
This matter comes before the Court by way of a Summons filed on behalf of the Plaintiff
seeking relief in the following terms:

Barclay, Ezekiel v Clifford Sewell, etal

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN CQMMON LAW
SUIT NO. C.L.B 241 OF 2000
BETWEEN EZEKIEL BARCLAY lST PLAINTIFF
AND CLIFFORD SEWELL 2ND PLAINTIFF
AND KIRK MITCHELL DEFENDANT
Ms. Christine Mae Hudson instructed by K Churchill Neita & Company for the l*
Plaintiff:
Mr. David Johnson and Ms. Althea Wilkins instructed by McGlashan, Robinson &
Company for Defendant.
Heard 15& June 200 1 and 13" July 200 1
JUDGMENT

Arid, John Esso Standard Oil S.A. Ltd

IN THE SCPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN COMMON LAW I
SUIT NO: C.L. 2000/ A-129
BETWEEN JOHN AIRD PLAINTIFF1 RESPONDENT
AND ESSO STANDARD OIL S.A. LIMITED DEFENDANT1 APPLICANT
%Y(\ tbI
Alton E. Morgan Esq., instructed by Alton E Morgan & Co for the PlaintiffRespondent;
CI Maurice Manning Esq., instructed by Nunes, Scholefield & Deleon for the
Defendant/Applicant.
This is an appIication by way of a summons under section 243 of the Judicature (Civil

Amritt, Syndney Robert & Madeline Franois Amritt v Duncan Bay Development Co. Ltd

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN EQUITY
SUIT NO. E 356 OF 1998
BETWEEN I ROBERT SYDNEY AMRITT lST PLAINTIFF
MADELINE FRANCOIS AMRITT 2ND PLAINTIFF
A N D DUNCAN BAY DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY LIMITED DEFENDANT
Heard: May 2 and 24.2001 and August 13.2001
Huntley Martin, Esq., for Plaintiffs.
Carol Davis, Esq., instructed by Davis Bennett & Beecher Bravo for Defendant.
JUDGEMENT
Rov Anderson, J.
In this matter, there are two (2) Summonses before the Court. The first is a

Pages

Covid-19

Emergency Matters

Emergency Matters

Matrimonial Proceedings

Customer Service

customer complaints image

Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan for the Jamaican Judiciary 2024-2028