Skip to main content

Vision 

A world-class judiciary utilizing innovation and technology for efficient service delivery.

Mission

To provide sound, timely judgements and efficient court services in an environment where all stakeholders are valued.

Brooks-mullings, Paulette May Et al v Annette Alicia Watson-copeland

Land Law – Recovery of Possession – Whether or Not the Claimants are Entitled to Recovery of Possession of Property from the Defendant who is a Joint Owner of the Property Equity – Constructive Trust – Whether or not the Defendant Holds the Beneficial Interest in the Property in Trust for the Claimants – Whether or not the Claimants Have Rebutted the Presumption of Joint Legal and Beneficial Ownership in the Property Where Parties are Registered as Joint Tenants on the Registered Title

Morgan, Ray v Clerk of Court, Kingston & St. Andrew Parish Court Et al

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES FOR UNLAWFUL DETENTION OF 2,504 DAYS – FAILURE OF MACHINERY FOR TIMELY APPELLATE REVIEW – NO RECORD OF APPEAL PRODUCED - CLAIMANT SERVED SIX YEARS EIGHT MONTHS IN EXCESS OF SENTENCE AS A RESULT – DUE PROCESS RIGHTS BREACHED – PRIVY COUNCIL REMITS FOR REHEARING ON SENTENCE – TAPERED RATE – VINDICATORY DAMAGES AWARDED

Reid, Ruel, Fritz Pinnock, Sharon Reid and Sharelle Reid v Hogarth, Jewel (The Clerk of the Courts), Her Honour Ms. Sanchia Burrell and Financial Investigations Division

Judicial Review - Renewed application for leave to apply for judicial review – Parish Court Judge – Ruling that Order for Indictment properly made – Whether appeal an alternate remedy – Whether ruling intra vires – Whether application has real prospect of success- Award of costs. 

Fullerton, Marjorie v The Board of Management of the Merl Grove High School, Teachers' Appeals Tribunal and Minister of Education

Judicial Review – Whether the correct procedure was followed by the Board and personnel committee of the Merl Grove High School in the dismissal of principal – Whether the members of the personnel committee who presided over the disciplinary hearing were tainted with bias – Whether the members of the committee made prejudicial statements prior to and during the disciplinary hearing that rendered the proceedings unfair and contrary to the principles of natural justice and breach of the claimant’s right to a fair hearing - Whether the decision of the Appeals Tribunal to uphold the decision of

Subscribe to 2026