IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA

I N COMMON LAW

SUIT NO. CL. C 099/2001

BETWEEN AUBREY CLAHAR CLAIMANT

AND ME'TROPOLITAN MANAGEMENT

TRANSPORT HOLDINGS LTD FIRST DEFENDANT

AND SELBOURNE GAYLE SECOND DEFENDANT

r Miss Marion Rose-Green instructed by Marion Rose-Green and Company for

the claimant

Mrs. Pauline Brown-Rose instructed by Blackridge Covington for both

defendants

November 9 and 10 2005

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT, NEGLIGENCE

SY KES J

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA

CLAIM NO: C.L. 20021 C- 186

BETWEEN LEROY CHIN CLAIMANT

AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF JAMAICA DEFENDANT

Heard: October 24 and 25,2005

Dennis Daly Q.C instructed by Daly, Thwaites and Co. for the Claimant; Mr. Peter

Wilson and Mrs. Amani Maknoon instructed by the Director of State Proceedings for the

Defendant.

ANDERSON J.

 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA

IN COMMON LAW

SUIT NO. CL 1993/C363

BETWEEN CENTURY NATIONAL BANK LIMITED CLAIMANT

AND CENTURY NATIONAL MERCHANT

BANKANDTR UST COMPANY LIMITED 2NDC LAIMANT

AND (I.

AND

JAMAICA REDEVELOPMENT

FOUNDATION, INC.

[Added by Order of Campbell, J

on the 3rd May 20041

3RD CLAIMANT

WINDSOR COMMERCIAL LAND

COMPANY LIMITED 1 ST DEFENDANT

AND SELVYN SMITH 2ND DEFENDANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JLTDICATUR OF JAMAICA

CLAIM NO. HCV 24 1612003

BETWEEN CAN-CARA DEVELOPMENT LTD CLAIMANT

AND MAGIL CONSTRUCTION JAMAICA LTD DEFEIVDANT

John Vassell instructed by DunnCox for the defendant.

Dr. Barnett and Philip Malcolm for the claimant.

Heard: 23rd February and loth ~a~ 2004 and 18Ih March 2@5

Campbell J.

Background:

Can-Cara Development Ltd. (Can-Cara) entered into a Joint Venture Agreement

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMACIA

IN COMMON LAW

CLAIM NO. C.L. 2002/C-238

BETWEEN RODNEY CAMPBELL CLAIMANT

A N D THE JAMAICA OBSERVER

LIMITED 1ST DEFENDANT

A N D CHESTER FRANCIS-JACKSON 2ND DEFENDANT

Miss C. Brown instructed by Vacianna & Whittingham for the Claimant.

Miss M. Brown instructed by Brown-Hamilton & Associates f o r the

Defendants.

HEARD: 2 0 t h April and gth June 2005

MANGATAL, J.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA

IN COMMON LAW

SUIT NO. CL C 248 OF 1995 I

BETWEEN LASCELLES CAMPBELL .

AND CLIFTON BENNElT

AND STEVE GARDENER

CLAIMANT

FIRST DEFENDANT

SECOND DEFENDANT

Miss Deborah Dowding instructed by Arthur Williams and Company ~

C for the claimant

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF

CIVIL DIVISION

SUIT NO. C. L. C. 385 OF 1998

BETWEEN KERRON CAMPBELL CLAIMANT

AND KENROY WATSON FIRST DEFENDANT

AND ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF JAMAICA SECOND DEFENDANT

/

/

Mr. Ainsworth Campbell for the claimant

Mr. Peter Wilson for the first and second defendants

November 4, December 6,30,2004 and January 6,2005

Sykes J (Ag)

FALSE IMPRISONMENT, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, ASSAULT AND

BAlTERY

C?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA

SUIT N0.C.L. 1999/C-302

BETWEEN

AND

HENRY CAMPBELL CLAIMANT

CECIL WHITTLE DEFENDANT

Mr. Leslie Campbell, instructed by Campbell & Campbell for the

Claimant.

Mr. Manley Nicholson, instructed by Nicholson Phillips for the

Defendant.

Heard: January 31, February 1 and April 19, 2005

Mangatal J:

1. Mr. Campbell claims to have suffered personal injury, loss and

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATLrRE OF JAMAICA

CLAIM NO. 2005 HCV 0 103 8

IN THE MATTER of an application by

LURLINE BRYAN to exercise jurisdiction

over the management of property owned by

GWENDOLYN JULEYE

I AND I

IN THE MATTER of Section 29 of the

Mental Health Act

Mr. Debayo Adedipe for Applicant

I

Mrs. Marvalyn Taylor-Wright instructed by Taylor-Wright & Company for Respondent

Heard: October 1 1, November 14, 2 1, and December 5,2005

Sinclair-Haynes, J (Ag.)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA

 CIVIL DIVISION

CL 200/B 089

BETWEEN

AND

GEORGE BRYAN CLAIMANT

GROSSElT HARRIS DEFENDANT

Mr. Ainsworth Campbell for the claimant

Mr. David Johnson instructed by Althea Wilkins for the defendant

October 18 and 21,2005

RULING ON ADMISSIBILITY OF WITNESS STATEMENT

RULES 26.7 (2), 29.4 (I), (2) AND 29.11 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES

SYKES J

The issue