Judicial Review – Labour Relations & Industrial Disputes Act – Decision of Industrial Disputes Tribunal – Whether Dismissal Justifiable – Whether Fair Hearing Required if Gross Misconduct Established – Relevance of Industrial Relations Code where there is gross misconduct

Application to strike out  - Whether claim frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of the process of the court - Whether any reasonable grounds for bringing the claim - Parties in previous litigation - Claim compromised and agreement attached in schedule to Tomlin Order filed in court – Terms varied by the parties - Court refused to exercise summary jurisdiction to enforce Tomlin Order - Whether current claim an attempt to enforce original agreement - Whether claim sustainable to prosecute new agreement as varied.

Company – Claim brought by company directors against debenture holders - Company later placed in receivership – Appointment of receiver by debenture holders - Directors continuing claim without consent of receiver – Debenture holders applying to have claim struck out for failing to secure receiver’s consent  - Concurrent power in receiver and directors to bring action in the name of the company - Whether consent of receiver required-whether indemnity necessary if no consent is given - Whether claim should be struck out if no security for costs is provided-applicability of section 388 o

Claim for interest in the land – Registered land – Equitable estoppels – Whether
transfer defeated equitable claim.

Appeal - Appeal from refusal by Resident Magistrate - Principles applicable - Reasons for refusal

Application to set aside default judgment – Service by registered post – Presumption of service – displacement of presumption of service – Default judgment irregularly entered – Improper party named as defendant – Substitution of defendant – Defence with realistic prospect of success – Duty owed by occupier to trespasser.

Application for consolidtion of claims - Distinction between consolidation of claims and trying of two claims at the same time - What court shold consider in deciding on whether claims should be consolidated.

Limitation of Actions Act – Visit to locus in quo – Whether Defendants in possession for 12 years – Whether crops and goats reared on property – Whether Defendants had fenced property – Whether registered proprietor entitled to an Order for possession.

Claim for breach of statutory duty and/or negligence – Duty to securely fence any dangerous part of any machinery in a factory – Duty to securely fence is not dependent on whether machine can be used as intended with secure fencing of same in place – Definition of ‘dangerous part’ – Whether protection afforded to those who unauthorizedly interact with dangerous parts of machinery in a factory.

Trade mark – Registration of Trade Mark – Appeal from decision of Registrar – Sections 2, 10, 11, 13, 14, 43 of Trade Marks Act, 2001 – Trade Mark Rules - Articles 2, 3, 4, 5 of First Council Directive on Trade Marks of December 21, 1988, No. 89/104.