CIVIL PROCEDURE – Specific disclosure – Whether the documents sought are directly relevant to any issue in the proceedings – Whether a Norwich Pharmacal order should be granted - Civil Procedure Rules, 28.6 and 28.7.

Arbitration - Whether the claimant’s case should be struck out or stayed pending arbitration - Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the claim - Whether the dispute is arbitrable – Whether the claimant breached the arbitration agreement - Whether there was a repudiatory breach – Whether arbitration was waiver by election - The Arbitration Act 2017

Civil Procedure - Striking out statement of case - Bills of Lading - Himalaya Clauses - Challenging the court’s jurisdiction - Summary Judgment and admiralty claims in rem - CPR 9.6, 15.3(e), 26.3(1)(c).

Contract - Breach of contract – Promise to pay debt – Statute of Frauds - Whether promise to pay was legally binding or was conditional – Whether promise to pay an assumption of liability – Whether condition fulfilled or waived - Novation – Adequacy of pleadings – CPR 8.9 (3)- CPR 8.9(1) – CPR 8.9A.

Damages - Motor vehicle accident - Entering a major road from a minor road - Whether the defendant liable in negligence for injuries suffered by the claimant - Muscle spasm, pains to neck and wrists - Assessment of damages - Whether award should be made for diminution of earning capacity - Whether claimant failed to mitigate his losses.

Civil Procedure - Whether to strike out the claimant’s statement of case as an abuse of process of the court - Distinction between test for interim injunction and test for summary judgment - Whether a statement of case is an abuse of process given judicial determination that there is no serious issue to be tried - Whether to grant summary judgment in favour of the defendant - Banker / Customer relationship - The contract / tort overlap in commercial contracts - CPR 26. 1(3) (c) and CPR 15.

Adverse possession – claimant claiming possessory title in his own right and through his deceased father - whether registered proprietor was in possession – whether the defendant dispossessed the registered proprietor

Interim Injunction – Whether serious issue to be tried – Whether fixed date claim form discloses any cause of action – Whether to allow amended pleadings - CPR 20.2(1) - Sections 2, 6, 8, 12 and 13 of The Industrial and Provident Societies Act

Civil Procedure - Application for the court to decline to exercise its jurisdiction to try a claim - Whether the failure to comply with CPR 8.16 amounts to ineffective service - Whether application to strike out the claim on the basis of no reasonable grounds to bring it amounts to submitting to the court’s jurisdiction - Whether permission required for filing an amended Fixed Date Claim Form in light of the application to strike out the claim.

Civil Procedure - Application for Summary Judgment - Whether the claimant has a real prospect of succeeding on the claim - CPR 15.2(a) - The nature of the evidence of a respondent to an application for summary judgment