Judicial Review - Application for Leave - Composite decision making process - Whether there are reasonable grounds for judicial review with a realistic prospect of success - Failure to challenge decision making process of appellate tribunal which is capable of curing defects in earlier process - Late stage amendment of application for leave.

Fraudulent misrepresentation - Representation that defendant was a lawyer – concealment of the nature of document for execution. Counterclaim for malicious prosecution of civil proceedings – False imprisonment – Unlawful search – Defamation – Psychological distress.

Injunction -  Principles to be applied – Breach of fiduciary duty - Whether maintainable against former director and officer  - Wrongful interference with contractual relations and Procuring breach of contract – Distinction and principles to be applied
Breach of Confidence – Principles to be applied

Civil – Interim payment – Damages for personal injury – Time within which defendants to file response to application for interim payment

Assessment of damages -  Multiple deep lacerations - Multiple fractures to the
right upper and right lower limbs – Superficial peroneal nerve injury – 23% upper
extremity impairment – 8% lower extremity impairment - 31% whole person
impairment.

Assessment of Damages - Whiplash – Hyper-extension injury to neck – Soft tissue
injury to right shoulder – Strain to ligaments of lower back - Chronic cervical strain
and chronic lumbar strain – 2% whole person impairment – Handicap on the labour
market

Revenue Law - Customs Tariff (Revision) (Amendment) Resolution 2007 - Interpretation - Tariff Heading 04.01 and 04.02 - Meaning of “Cream” - Meaning of “concentrated” and “not concentrated” - Whether Elle & Vire whipping and cooking creams imported by the Appellant are “creams, concentrated” within the meaning of Tariff Heading 04.02.

Assessment of Damages -  Soft Tissue injury - Fractured right acetabulum - Right
foot drop - 15% lower extremity impairment - 6% whole person impairment –
Handicap on the labour market

Expert Witness - Rule 32.2 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) – Case Management Powers - Parts 25 and 26 of the CPR - Application for Stay of Proceedings pending examination by an expert - Whether the Applicants’ request is reasonable - Whether the Respondent’s refusal is unreasonable – The risk of prejudice to either party should the stay be granted or refused

Evidence – Civil Practice – Application to strike out portions of Witness Statements– Hearsay Rules – Whether any relevant exceptions – Relevance-Role of statement of case - Whether condition for service of Notice of Intention to Rely satisfied by service of witness statement.