Skip to main content

Vision 

A world-class judiciary utilizing innovation and technology for efficient service delivery.

Mission

To provide sound, timely judgements and efficient court services in an environment where all stakeholders are valued.

Newman, Garnet (Administratrix of the Estate of Claris Crawford-Thomas, deceased) v Crawford, Consie and Alfred Crawford et al

Civil Procedure – Res judicata – The doctrine of res judicata – Issue estoppel – The doctrine of issue estoppel – Whether the instant claim is a collateral attack on a previous order of the court – Whether the instant claim offends the doctrine of res judicata – Whether the claim offends the doctrine of issue estoppel – Whether the formalities for the sale of land have been satisfied in respect of the purported sale and purchase of the subject property – Intestates’ Estates and Property Charges Act, sections 2(1) and 4(1), Interpretation Act, section 41

Harrison, Joy Patricia v The Council fo the Caribbean Maritime University

Application for leave for judicial review - Nature of the application for leave -
Burden of proof - Standard of proof - Whether private law contract being
pursued as public law matter – Whether impugned decision amenable to
judicial review - Who is a public officer – Private law right derived from statute
distinct from private law right derived from contract - Leave refused
application to be treated as ordinary claim.

Thomas Kasheva and Charles Thomas v Southern Regional Health Authority and the Attorney General of Jamaica

Civil Procedure— Rule 26. 3 (1) (c)—Application to Strike Out Statement of Case—Rule 20.6—Amendment to statement case—Limitation period expired—Rule 23.7 (4)—Failure to file Certificate of Next of Friend—Rule 10.3 (9)—Application to file defence out of time

Rowe, James v Rowe, Elaine and Roydell Thompson

Sections 174, 178, and 179 of the Companies Act - Whether the Claimant is entitled to a re-transfer of his shareholdings in the company - Whether a resulting trust was created in favour of the Claimant - Whether the presumption of advancement is displaced - Whether the removal of the Claimant as director is valid - Whether the appointment of the 1st and 2nd Defendants as directors of the company is valid

Subscribe to 2023