Civil Procedure - Whether to strike out the claimant’s statement of case as an abuse of process of the court - Distinction between test for interim injunction and test for summary judgment - Whether a statement of case is an abuse of process given judicial determination that there is no serious issue to be tried - Whether to grant summary judgment in favour of the defendant - Banker / Customer relationship - The contract / tort overlap in commercial contracts - CPR 26. 1(3) (c) and CPR 15.

Civil Practice & Procedure – Application for interim injunction – Requirements for the grant of an interim injunction – American Cyanamid Co. v Ethicon Ltd. – Whether there is a serious issue to be tried – Whether damages is an adequate remedy – Balance of convenience – The Restrictive Covenants (Discharge and Modification) Act, S. 4 – Whether stay of proceedings is appropriate given the fact that the Defendants have applied to remedy the breach.

Civil Procedure and Practice – Defamation – Whether the publication contained defamatory material against the Claimant – Defence of justification – Defence of fair comment – Defence of qualified privilege – Assessment of damages – General damages – Aggravated damages – Exemplary damages – The Defamation Act 2013.

Civil Practice & Procedure - Negligence – Motor vehicle accident – Personal injury – Whether the Claimant was contributory negligent – Apportionment of liability – Assessment of damages.

<p>Landlord and Tenant - Option to purchase at fixed price -Term expires and lessee holds over as statutory tenant - Option not exercised during term -Transfer of property to beneficiaries - Whether option exercisable by Statutory Tenant.</p>

Civil Procedure - CPR rule 11.16 - Considerations on application to extend time - Whether time should be extended to make application to set aside orders made without notice - Application to set aside order for substituted service on insurance company - Whether reasonable efforts made by insurer to contact insured to bring contents of claim form and particular of claim to his attention.

Civil Practice and Procedure - Establishment and effect of conditional order - Rule 26.1(7) - Rule 27.11 - Whether application to vary date for compliance in conditional order is to be made pursuant to rule 26.8 or rule 27.11 - Considerations on application to vary under rule 26.1(7) - Whether time for compliance with conditional order should be varied - Rules 26.3(1) (a) and (b) - Considerations for striking out - Whether statements of case should be struck out for noncompliance with court orders or as an abuse of process - Rule 9.6 - Whether procedure to dispute court’s jurisdiction to tr

Civil Practice and Procedure – Civil Procedure Rules – Rule 26.8 – Applications for Relief From Sanction – Whether Claimant’s Application for Relief Was Made Promptly – Whether or Not Claimant Would Be Entitled to Relief Otherwise.
Civil Practice and Procedure – Consequence if Application For Relief from Sanction Fails and Witness Statement is Not Allowed – Whether or Not the Claimant’s Claim Should Be Struck Out Due to Lack of Evidence to Support Same at Trial.